Spin Doesn’t Have to Be a Dirty Word
There are multiple definitions of public relations, as there are laundry detergents.
THE SPIN DOCTORS
Some believe PR people craft messages evoked with feelings of fear and guilt, to persuade people into believe something. Or others would add that public relations practitioners are hired to schmooze and win people over. However the most common belief is public relations is about “spin.” Spinning an issue, service or product to make it look better than what it actual is.
BREAKING IT DOWN TO ITS SIMPLEST FORM
In reality some practitioners do practice these method. However the general public may not realize, but there is merit in the art of PR. To clear up any confusion before proceeding, lets define public relations to its simplest and begin with a base definition that can be agreed upon.
CREDIBILITY IS THE NAME OF THE GAME
Public relations, “is about much more than “spin”; it is about establishing credibility, building relationships with key publics and effective two-way communication,” defines social media expert, Diana L. Reid, from the Social Edge Group.
The key word within the last sentence was credibility. Building credibility and trust within people and organizations is not a game merely based around schmoozing and spinning. Creditably is built through trust, commitment and open communication. To become creditable most public relations practitioners abide by the Canadian Public Relations Society mission statement and declaration of principles.
AND YOU THOUGHT WE DIDN’T HAVE ANY ETHICS! TISK TISK
Yes, public relations practitioners have to abide by a standard of ethics. The list of ethical standards was created to help PR practitioners make decisions that are best suited for the individual as well at the organization they work for. A good example of a credible public relations act is from the recent Ontario spinach growers problem.
POPEYE HAS E-COLI?
In the last few month spinach has been getting a bad rap. The Food Land Growers of Ontario declared that Ontario spinach is not safe to eat, due to fears of E-Coli poisoning. Thankfully, the E-Coli spinach scare is behind us. Thankfully, communicators began spreading the word that spinach is once again OK. Multiple media outlets have been picking up the news and reassuring people that it’s OK to eat spinach one again. For instance, the Toronto Star dedicated half a page of spinach recipes from Queen Victoria Spinach. This is a great example of how ethical and credible public relations has effectively communicated and obverted a crisis. By successful using public relations the Ontario spinach growers can feel reassured they are producing and selling a product that people feel safe about buying. With the help of PR the Ontario spinach growers are rebuilding their brand to be honest, safe and creditable.
CAN WE CHANGE THE PERCEPTION? ITS OUR JOB TOO!
People are always going to believe that public relations practitioners are the “masters” of spin. By building lasting relationships and opening the door of two-way communication with key publics and organizations is how practitioners will build credibility.

RaWeiss said,
July 4, 2008 at 5:52 pm
I think ‘spin’ has a dozen definitions. I usually consider it insincere communications for the sake of playing something up.
Now, I’m not sure what you were trying to say, going from spin, to credibility, to the spinach issue. Do you mean that by not engaging in ‘spin’, we build credibility so that when an issue like the e-coli scare comes along, we’re trusted?
When is spin not a dirty word? That’s what I wanted to hear your thoughts on.
I think that sometimes spin, when used lightly, is fine. Extra emphasis on SOMETIMES.
For example – I just wrote an internal news article about our Canada Day event. Some attendees had a great time at the event; they brought their kids, they enjoyed the band and the bbq. However, many seemed pretty indifferent. It was just an hour or two away from their desks.
I’m not going to write a dull article for the people who didn’t have fun. I’m going to write a fun article for the people who did! Some might call that spin. It’s definitely not a balanced article.
What do you think?
vocabcommunications said,
July 4, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Agree!
“Spin” has a million and one definitions.
You hit the nail on the head!
Yes, I believe that if we do not engage in the “negative aspects of spin,” then PR people will begin to gain more credibility. As PR practitioners, we need to highlight, the good things we do for organizations and the public (more than we do). The spinach example was trying to demonstrate that were not the big bad wolf. We really do care about what happens to people.
Now for your article about Canada Day. I don’t really view that as spin. I’m not saying that it can’t be. If I had to rate it on my “spin” scale from 1 to 10 I would consider it to be a 1.
Now…with that said. Did you lose any sleep over the matter? Was writing the article an ethical delemia for you?
If so, then maybe on your “spin” scale it is rated higher.
To each their own.
As you know there are various levels of “spin” but it ultimately depends on what your degrees of spin are.
But if we always keep our ethical stance in check, PR people will begin to “spin” …lol… the negative idea of PR into something positive.
RaWeiss said,
July 4, 2008 at 7:08 pm
My article ranks pretty low on my ‘spin’ scale. I’d say 1 or 2. So no, I don’t lose any sleep over it.
Getting people excited over an issue that really doesn’t have the substance or merit to carry that excitement, even in it’s most key target audience. That’s bad spin, imo.
Rose said,
July 7, 2008 at 11:08 pm
PR and Spin.
We want to increase positive exposure and downplay the negative stuff.
Great, relevant example RaWeiss – I think journalists struggle with this daily as well.
But I don’t consider this “spin,” and I don’t think that “spin” is relevant to the practice of PR today, nor in the future of PR.
I think in general, it isn’t well-defined. Spin sometimes even refers to the timing of sending out a news release… but isn’t that just about understanding and appreciating journalist’s deadlines?
We are in the business of helping organizations tell their stories. We do it in the most honest and truthful way. The end goal of PR is to build lasting relationships with key audiences. “Spin” is a short-term approach, a lousy approach and counterproductive in the long-run, always.
The question I’m interested in, is: what qualifies as “spin” ? The practice of PR is not and should not be synonymous with “spin.” Many PR professionals are also working on behalf of non-profit organizations. The same tactics or strategies may be used regardless of whether you work for a company interested in profit, or an organization that’s not. So, as someone just entering the field, what qualifies as spin?
What could be a wrong approach in how we frame issues?
So far, I think the following are big “no-nos”:
being disingenuous, cherry-picking, or being the opposite of transparent …
it’s just bad, ineffective, meaningless PR.